Friday, January 13, 2012

Is Science Broken? Part 0: Most Medical Research "Is Misleading, Exaggerated, And Often Flat-Out Wrong."

This is the article that drew my attention to the wholesale nature of the problem:
"Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Science"

"...Indeed, given the breadth of the potential problems raised at the meeting, can any medical-research studies be trusted?

"That question has been central to Ioannidis’s career. He’s what’s known as a meta-researcher, and he’s become one of the world’s foremost experts on the credibility of medical research. He and his team have shown, again and again, and in many different ways, that much of what biomedical researchers conclude in published studies—conclusions that doctors keep in mind when they prescribe antibiotics or blood-pressure medication, or when they advise us to consume more fiber or less meat, or when they recommend surgery for heart disease or back pain—is misleading, exaggerated, and often flat-out wrong. He charges that as much as 90 percent of the published medical information that doctors rely on is flawed. His work has been widely accepted by the medical community; it has been published in the field’s top journals, where it is heavily cited; and he is a big draw at conferences. Given this exposure, and the fact that his work broadly targets everyone else’s work in medicine, as well as everything that physicians do and all the health advice we get, Ioannidis may be one of the most influential scientists alive. Yet for all his influence, he worries that the field of medical research is so pervasively flawed, and so riddled with conflicts of interest, that it might be chronically resistant to change—or even to publicly admitting that there’s a problem."

Even though this is not new, I wanted to have a link to it on this blog, just for reference. (Emphasis mine.)

Part 1, Part 2.